Sheriff’s deputy accused of rape, soliciting bribes while on duty

A Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department deputy accused of raping women and soliciting bribes while on duty is due in court Wednesday morning.

___ ___ ___ , 28, was arrested at his home Monday night without incident after a nearly three-year investigation. ___ , a seven-year department veteran, was most recently assigned to patrol duties at the Palmdale Station. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

11 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

In Palmdale, no less, which until a few weeks ago (thanks CA RSOL) had some of the most crippling 290 restrictions on earth.

And did I read this right – he was suspended for 3 (three) years WITH pay????

Here is another one (just today) serving and protecting.

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-lapd-officer-sexual-molestation-20130730,0,3099760.story

What is preferential treatment treatment…????………….public
funded personnel………laws and how you’re treated depends
if you’re a public employee or not.

Where is the justice? Why is this man being paid? It’s time to clean up your city, Palmdale! Crooked cops need to suffer the same consequences although I don’t wish the sex offender registry upon anyone. It’s too great a punishment, despite what the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2003.

As I’ve said many times before, the largest single group of sex offenders by vocation is law enforcement. Their victims are coerced and threatened to not say a word “or else”, when a law enforcement officer is finally caught, there tends to be much more love than there is for John Q. Public and when they’re sentenced (rarely) their sentences are usually one third that of their civilian counterparts. Go figure!
Recently, the Probation Chief in Santa Clara County gets popped for kiddie porn. Follow that and see if he receives a slap on the wrist or gets a free pass.

I wish the registry on him.. Those that represent the law should face the punishment of the law…

Speaking of special treatment – whatever happened to this?

https://all4consolaws.org/2012/09/marina-del-rey-deputy-sentenced-in-teen-sex-case/

This person is not on the web site (don’t look if you are not allowed to) as a conviction of OC with a 15 year old would require.

If I were in LA County I might just go down to the courthouse to take a looksie…

@ Joe and Bluewall; we all know that law enforcement gets a free pass. I’ve written the state AG and her response is that it’s up to the counties (to give a free pass) or to sentence as they so choose. The police get away with it, time and time again and it goes unpublished and unreported.
Police are the largest group of sex offenders by vocation!